U.S. denies ship entry as anti-terror law takes hold
Source: Reuters
July 2, 2004
WASHINGTON/LONDON
(Reuters) - The United States denied entry to a Bolivian-flagged
freighter on Thursday as tough new global laws to protect shipping
from terrorist attacks took effect with little disruption to
global trade.
Washington, fearing an attack or infiltration by al Qaeda from
the sea, has vowed to police the new United Nations codes strictly
by turning away ships that are not security-certified or delaying
ones that have called at "contaminated ports."
The U.S. Coast Guard said it ordered Bolivian-flagged cargo
ship Dahomey Express to leave U.S. waters because it lacked
the new security certificates. The United States was a major
driving force behind the law, and is being seen as a litmus
test for the new codes' effectiveness.
Coast Guard spokeswoman Jolie Shifflet said the vast majority
of the roughly 250 ships arriving in the United States on Thursday
received the green light for entry.
On the eve of the July 1 deadline to implement the new anti-terrorism
measures, only about half of the world's ports and 53 percent
of global shipping had complied with the International Ship
and Port Facility Security code, or ISPS, according to the U.N.'s
International Maritime Organization, its chief architect.
Shipping sources warned that despite the relatively smooth first
day, it was too early to say the transition to the new regime
had been a success, adding it would take days and weeks to get
a full picture of compliance.
Rupert Herbert-Burns, a senior consultant with the Maritime
Intelligence Group which advises ports on security threats,
said the ISPS was a good step, but no panacea to wipe out security
threats.
"There are still thousands of port facilities around the
world, particularly in the less developed world, which won't
be in compliance for some time. That is obviously of concern,"
he said. "It's not going to be watertight until you've
got much, much more endemic coverage."
Nigeria, for example, had said on Thursday that just three of
its 53 port terminals were ready. But it showed little immediate
concern over flunking the deadline and said the compliance problems
would not affect its precious oil exports.
SMOOTH SAILING IN ASIA, EUROPE
The ISPS code, signed by 147 governments, requires ports, stevedoring
companies and owners of ships larger than 500 tons to draw up
plans for responding to a terror threat, implement tighter security
around facilities and train staff.
In Asia, where most
major shipping lines and key container ports had met the U.N.'s
July 1 deadline, there were no initial reports of delays.
At the world's largest transshipment hub in Singapore, all 41
ships that visited the port by 0200 GMT on Thursday were compliant.
Traffic at Taiwan's two main international ports of Kaohsiung
-- the world's sixth-largest container terminal -- and Keelung
moved swiftly throughout the day, with no vessels requiring
searches, harbor officials said.
Australia, where all ships and ports involved in international
trade met the ISPS deadline, was keeping a wary eye on suspect
vessels but did not delay any.
In Europe, where most mega-ports were in full compliance, there
were also no reports of early snags.
A spokesman in Rotterdam, Europe's biggest port, said he did
not foresee any disruption to trade or major incidents involving
non-compliant ships.
"We are at the center of the big cargo shipping lanes,
so ports like ours, have been very security conscious for years.
Shady shipping lines and murky flags of convenience are unlikely
to call here as we are at the top of the pyramid," the
spokesman said.
He said even if a ship were to arrive without a ship security
certificate it would not be turned away or even fined because
the Netherlands had "no legal basis" to do that.
Germany's Transport Ministry said uncertified vessels were still
being allowed to dock, although ships from a high-risk region
that had made no attempt to comply might be stopped from doing
so.
The Paris MOU, which overseas maritime safety and security in
13 EU countries, as well as Russia and Canada, reported it was
business as usual.
By Caroline Drees and Stefano Ambrogi



